雅思大作文真题及范文总结
- 2024年11月01日17:52 来源:小站整理
- 参与(0) 阅读(730)
以下是雅思大作文真题及范文的总结:
一、真题回顾
-
2024年1月6日
- 题目:Some people believe children should have organized activities in their free time. Others believe children should decide what to do in their free time on their own. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
- 译文:一些人认为孩子们应该在空闲时间组织活动。其他人认为孩子们应该自己决定在空闲时间做什么。讨论双方并给出你的观点。
-
2024年1月13日
- 题目:Some people think that planning for future is a waste of time. They believe it is more important to focus on the present. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
- 译文:有些人认为计划未来是浪费时间。他们认为关注当下更重要。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?
-
2024年1月27日
- 题目:Some people think a job not only provides income but also a social life. Others think it is better to develop a social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
- 译文:有些人认为工作不仅提供收入,还提供社交生活。其他人认为和不一起工作的人发展社交生活更好。讨论两种观点并给出你自己的观点。
-
2024年2月3日
- 题目:Some people believe that what children watch on television influences their behavior. Others say that the amount of time spent watching television influences their behavior. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
- 译文:一些人认为孩子们看的电视会影响他们的行为。其他人说看电视的时间长短会影响他们的行为。讨论两种观点并给出你自己的观点。
-
2024年2月24日
- 题目:Some people say that art (e.g. painting, music, poetry) can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can be only made by those with special abilities. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
- 译文:有些人说艺术(如绘画、音乐、诗歌)每个人都可以创作,而另一些人认为只有那些有特殊能力的人才能创作。讨论两种观点并给出你的观点。
-
2024年3月2日
- 题目:Some cities have vehicle-free days when private cars, trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center. People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis and metro on vehicle free days. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
- 译文:一些城市有无车日,禁止私家车、卡车和摩托车进入市中心。人们被鼓励在无车日使用公共交通,如公交车、出租车和地铁。利大于弊吗?
-
2024年8月24日
- 题目:Nowadays, people believe that governments should invest taxpayers' money in healthcare, while others believe that money should be used in other areas. Discuss both points of view and give your opinion.
- 译文:现在,人们认为政府应该将纳税人的钱投资于医疗保健,而其他人则认为这些钱应该用于其他领域。讨论这两种观点并给出你的看法。
-
2024年9月某场考试
- 题目:Historical objects in museums all over the world should be returned to their country of origin. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
- 译文:世界各地博物馆中的历史文物应该被送回原籍国。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?
二、范文示例
以下是一篇针对“世界各地博物馆中的历史文物是否应该被送回原籍国”这一题目的范文:
The Repatriation of Historical Objects: A Balanced View
The debate concerning the repatriation of historical objects held in museums worldwide has sparked heated discussions among scholars, policymakers, and the public. On one side of the argument, there are those who firmly believe that these artifacts should be returned to their country of origin. They argue that cultural heritage and historical justice are paramount considerations. Many historical objects were acquired through immoral or even illegal means, such as colonial conquests, theft, or unequal treaties. Returning these objects to their homelands can rectify past injustices, reconnect local communities with their cultural identities and histories, and foster cultural diversity and respect for different cultures.
However, opponents of repatriation contend that museums serve as vital educational institutions that preserve and display human history, providing learning opportunities for future generations. By showcasing artifacts from diverse cultures, museums promote cross-cultural understanding and appreciation. Removing these objects from museums would deprive people of these invaluable learning experiences and hinder the dissemination of knowledge. Furthermore, the practical challenges of repatriation, including tracing the original owners, the costs of transportation and restoration, and the lack of sufficient resources in many museums to address these issues, especially for countries with vast collections of precious artifacts, are significant obstacles.
In my view, the decision on whether to repatriate historical objects should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific context, provenance, and the wishes of the local community for each artifact. While repatriation can symbolize historical justice and cultural respect, it should not come at the expense of global education and cultural exchange. Museums should strive to find a balance between protecting cultural heritage and promoting cross-cultural understanding, working closely with local communities and governments to ensure that artifacts are properly preserved and respected.
Ultimately, the discussion on the repatriation of historical objects is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires comprehensive consideration of various factors. Both sides have valid points, and our goal should be to ensure that these precious cultural heritages are given the respect and protection they deserve, while also promoting global education and cultural understanding. Through collaboration and dialogue, museums, governments, and local communities can find solutions to create a more inclusive and equitable world for future generations.
这篇范文首先简要介绍了辩论的背景,然后分别从支持和反对的角度阐述了两种观点,最后提出了作者自己的观点,即应根据具体情况来决定是否归还历史文物,并强调博物馆应在保护文化遗产和促进跨文化理解之间找到平衡点。这样的结构使得文章条理清晰,逻辑严谨,符合雅思英语作文的要求。