范文赏析：警察应不应该配枪
Unlike other countries, police in UK do not carry guns. Some think it leaves citizen unprotected, others think it reduce the overall violence in the society. Please discuss.
At the mention of a policeman, most people will have in their mind the image of a strong man or woman with a gun on his belt. But it is not the case in UK: police there do not carry guns. People’s opinions towards this vary.
Some people think this contributes to the decrease of violence in society. For one thing, when a robber sees a policeman pointing a gun at him, he may get exasperated and desperate and, out of despair, he may hurt people around him. If the policeman does not carry a gun, nothing of the kind will happen. For another, to err is human and no one can guarantee that a policeman does not mis-shoot the pedestrians when he is hurriedly chasing a criminal. Lastly, some policemen have committed serious crimes with the guns they had.
However, other people hold different views: police without guns leave citizens unprotected. To begin with, at critical moments, guns in policemen’s hands can be essential in fighting against the criminals. Imagine a bank robber pointing a gun at the head of a hostage. A policeman can hardly do anything about it if he does not carry a gun. However, the situation can be totally reversed otherwise. Moreover, policemen are well-trained and thus rarely hurt innocent people with their guns.
As far as I am concerned, the latter is more favorable. To my mind, policemen are the very few people on earth who should carry guns, with which they can effectively protect the citizens. (283 words)
点评：用词准确，行文流畅，符合英国人的阅读习惯，没有词汇及语句错误。
但用例略显苍白，说服力不够强，比如：罪犯看到带枪的警察就会自动投降，甚至绝望放弃，小编看过无数警匪篇，和抢劫新闻报道，没见到过哪个匪徒会做出这样的举动。倒是带枪的警察可以很好的保护自己，跟坏人展开殊死搏斗，另外，也可以控制局面。这里也有一个盲区，那就是什么样的警察没有交代清楚，普通的巡逻警察和特警可是不同的，特警面对的都是亡命狂徒，当然要配枪，巡逻警察其实有个警棍也够用了。小编的观点，仅供参考。
