- 2017年06月26日15:56 来源：小站整理
- 参与（4） 阅读（3093）
Government funding for universities should only be used for scholarships for best students. And all the other funding should come from student fee and private organizations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?政府对大学的资助应该仅用于最优秀的学生的奖学金，其他的资助的资金应该来自于学费和私人机构。同意与否?
One of the problems that have constantly troubled the government is how to manage public funds reasonably so as to ensure that its revenue is spent in the most cost-effective way.Some cannot help wondering whether the gpvernment should only support best students in universities.
people are, to some extent, justified instating that he funds should only be provided for the best students. With limited funds and so many fields to support, the government ought to manage the money wisely. If the funding of a university relies solely on the government, we cannot expect the country to enjoy a long-term economic development. It is also impossible for medical care system and'infrastructural construction, which also relies heavily on the government, to run well.
However, to be partial to the sacalled tab students deviåies from what we expect Of the government, one of whose principles is*o ensure that every one is given equal right to enjoy public resources. To offer top preferential despite its original purpose to save public funds, may incur people's—doubt "put they authority and credibility of the government.
Another question is the difficulty in defining what kinds of students are really top. Bill Gate did not finish his study in university, he-can never becalled a top student, but he far exceeded his classmates in terms of the contribution to the.ociety. In other words, to be good in academic performances does not always mean that students can serve the pub ic well after graduation.
In conclusion, I disagree with the view that the government should only support the top students. Even if well intended, this measure might face unpredictable factors and lead to people's dissatisfaction with the government. 286 words