2018年雅思大作文真题范文：年轻人不能胜任政府要职？

2018年03月15日09:36 来源：小站整理: 参与（0）阅读（27115）

摘要：为大家带来的2014年7月12日雅思写作大作文真题:有些人认为年轻人不适合在政府中担任重要职务。一些人认为，年轻的人们接受这些职位是一个好主意。同意或不同意?本题为社会类话题，请查看范文详情：

考鸭们都知道，2018年的雅思作文真题都来自于历史题库。本文就为大家梳理历年雅思写作真题范文——社会类话题：Some people think younger people are not suitable for important positions in government in countries. Some think it will be a good idea for younger people to take on these positions. Agree or disagree?——2014年7月12日雅思写作真题

雅思写作题目讲解

参考思路：(双边均衡再给出自己观点)

一部分人反对年轻人担任政府要职：

1. 年轻人缺乏经验，不利于参加政治活动

2. 年轻人的影响力不足，难以开展政治活动

另一部分人认为年轻人理应享有这种机会：

1.年轻人提供新的视角，有利于社会发展

2.年轻人有权参与政治，帮助更多全面的政策

雅思写作大作文参考范文：

As a growing number of new faces entered political arena, the eligibility of young people for government affairs has aroused an intense debate. Some people contend that people in 20s or 30s are not ideal candidates for policy-makers or positions alike. Others, however, disagree with this statement. In this essay, two diametrically opposed stances will be examined before my ideas are elaborated.

随着越来越多的新面孔进入政治舞台，年轻人参加政府事务的资格引发了激烈的辩论。一些人认为，20或30岁的人不是理想的决策者或职位的候选人。然而，其他人则不同意这种说法。在这篇文章中，我将对两种截然相反的观点进行分析，然后再阐述我的观点。

On the one hand, it is argued that politics is not an outlet for the young to pursue their career goals. For one thing, compared with their veteran counterparts, young politicians seem inexperienced and unsophisticated, which makes them experientially disadvantaged in decision making. For another, elder government officials are more likely to play an active role in political campaigns due to their long-established influence and hard-earned reputation. In other words, the general public is seemingly more supportive of rules and regulations enforced by those who have served in the government for a long period.

一方面，人们认为政治并不是年轻人追求自己事业目标的出路。首先，与经验丰富的同行相比，年轻的政治家们似乎缺乏经验，缺乏经验，这使得他们在决策过程中处于不利地位。另一方面，年长的政府官员更有可能在政治活动中扮演积极的角色，因为他们有着长期的影响力和来之不易的声誉。换句话说，公众似乎更支持那些长期在政府任职的人所执行的规章制度。

On the other hand, others are convinced that the younger generation is equally qualified for authoritative positions. First and forest, recruiting more young people could reinvigorate leadership and yield a vibrant political structure. For instance, a more dimensional and updated welfare system can be expected since younger minds are less likely to be confined to conventions and therefore, in this regard are fairly competitive. Furthermore, the ever-changing world calls for collaboration between the young and the elder in order to take a nation forward and bring about greater changes.

另一方面，其他人也确信年轻一代同样有资格获得权威职位。首先和森林，招募更多的年轻人可以重新激发领导能力，并产生一个充满活力的政治结构。例如，一个更多维和更新的福利体系可以预期，因为年轻的头脑不太可能局限于传统，因此，在这方面相当有竞争力。此外，不断变化的世界呼唤年轻人和老人之间的合作，以便带领一个国家前进，带来更大的变化。

As far as I am concerned, competence, instead of age, should be deemed the decisive indicator regarding one’s eligibility for political participation. Another equally crucial factor is the need ti cater to the next generation’s burgeoning demand for engagement in either national or international politics. Meanwhile, it is also advisable that there should be “age of candidacy”, meaning that nay citizen is supposed to meet the minimum age requirement, as many countries have institutionalized this “policy”.

就我而言，能力，而不是年龄，应该被认为是决定政治参与资格的决定性指标。另一个同样重要的因素是，需要迎合下一代人在国家或国际政治中日益增长的参与需求。同时，也建议应该有“候选资格”，这意味着，不应该公民被认为符合最低年龄要求，因为许多国家已经将这种“政策”制度化了。

更多2018雅思写作真题范文，请关注小站雅思频道。