- 2018年03月25日18:13 来源：小站整理
- 参与（1） 阅读（1451）
考鸭们都知道，雅思写作话题有一个历史题库。本文就为大家梳理历年雅思写作真题范文：The range and quality of food has been improved with the development of technology and scientific advance. Some people think it is good and others think it is harmful. Discuss two sides and give your opinion.(随着科技的进步和科学的进步，食品的范围和质量得到了提高。有些人认为它是好的，有些人认为它是有害的。讨论双方意见。)2016年6月25日科技类雅思写作真题
Technology, the mighty force which is created by the comparatively smaller, walnut-shaped human brain, has changed the landscape, redefined the natural resources and even diversified the food we human beings rely on. The opponents and the proponents both hold their own justifications and I deem that there is no black-or-white conclusion of this issue.
It is more likely that food shortage will undermine the wellbeing of masses less frequently if technology and scientific breakthrough improve the quality and range of choices. In the past when we human beings relied heavily on the rather limited sources of food, a spell of abnormal weather can pose a threat to the yield of the crops and the health condition of livestock, let alone the unpredicted climate change. However, the miserable past is no longer the case today. People are less prone to the impact of scarcity of the food supply and the quality as more food sources can be utilized with the advancement of science.
On the other hand, the skeptics think technology a two-edged sword and the potential risks of technologically-modified food can never be underestimated. The security of some food generated by technology has not been identified, thereby entailing some unpredictable consequences. The genetically modified food, a milestone in human history, provides more options of food and enhance the quality on the one hand, also induces the doubts on its potential harm to human body and health.
Personally, I suppose a reconciliation should be achieved between this two statements. What really matters on this issue is how properly the technologically- changed food can function in the society and what the following steps we shall take if some dire consequences arise. After all , it is the tiny brain that has the final say instead of the technology it creates.就我个人而言，我认为这两种说法之间应该达成和解。在这个问题上真正重要的是，技术改变的食物在社会中如何发挥作用，如果出现一些可怕的后果，我们将采取以下步骤。毕竟，它是一个微小的大脑，拥有最终的发言权，而不是它创造的技术。