雅思大作文写作范文——征收交通拥挤税利弊

2018年11月16日17:11 来源：小站整理: 参与（0）阅读（18442）

摘要：雅思大作文作为一个output的环节，要有足够的input去支撑。因此，我们特地为各位考生带来雅思大作文写作范文集合。

雅思大作文不仅考查考生的基本英语能力，如单词量，架构文章的能力，也考查逻辑思维。多数考生时常不知如何下笔，其中一个原因可能是因为input的内容还不够，没有写作思路无从写起。俗话说近朱者赤，形成思路的最有效的办法之一是读好的范文。因此，我们特为大家总结出雅思大作文写作范文，供大家借鉴。今天给大家介绍一篇——征收交通拥挤税利弊哪个更大？

下面就请欣赏这篇雅思大作文范文。

题目：
In some countries, the government has tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative?
征收交通拥挤税利弊哪个更大？
范文：
Growing number of cars on the road and congestion is causing problems for the authorities. Some countries have proposed congestion tax to tackle this issue. I think that this can be a positive development. Analysing the factors such as significant reduction in a number of cars, air and noise pollution and clean environment will prove this.
道路上越来越多的汽车和拥堵给当局带来了问题。一些国家已经提议征收交通拥堵税来解决这个问题。我认为这是一个积极的发展。分析汽车数量显著减少、空气和噪音污染以及清洁环境等因素将证明这一点。
Firstly, we see a reduction in a number of cars entering the city after the tax. People look for alternate routes and times to avoid the traffic. For example, entering London during rush hours costs 10£. This forces people to look for alternate time and routes to enter the city. Similarly, people prefer using buses in Dublin during rush hours over their cars just to avoid the congestion. Hence reducing the traffic load on city road. The actual reduction in cars is thus positive factor for the cities itself.

首先，我们看到在税收之后进入城市的汽车数量减少了。人们寻找替代路线和时间来避开交通。例如,进入高峰时期伦敦成本10£。这迫使人们寻找其他时间和路线进入城市。同样，在都柏林，人们更喜欢在高峰时间乘坐公交车，而不是开车，只是为了避免交通堵塞。从而降低了城市道路的交通负荷。因此，汽车的实际减少对城市本身是积极因素。

Secondly, less number of cars reduce the overall air and noise pollution. A recent survey in UK and China shows that implementation of tax has significantly reduced the pollution levels. This allows the people to live in a pure environment and thus bringing a positive change.
其次，减少汽车数量可以减少空气和噪音污染。最近在英国和中国进行的一项调查显示，税收的实施大大降低了污染水平。这让人们生活在一个纯净的环境中，从而带来积极的变化。
On the contrary, many people may argue that governments should spend money on public transport systems rather than tax but such systems take time and money to develop and might not be the right thing to do at present time.
相反，许多人可能会认为政府应该把钱花在公共交通系统上，而不是税收，但这种系统需要时间和金钱来发展，在目前可能不是正确的做法。
In conclusion, the actual reduction in the number of cars and less air and noise pollution are the advantages brought in by congestion tax. I agree that it is a positive development but the need of the hour is to develop better public transport systems by the government.
综上所述，汽车数量的实际减少以及空气和噪音污染的减少是交通拥堵税带来的优势。我同意这是一项积极的发展，但现在需要的是政府发展更好的公共交通系统。