雅思写作大作文驳论范文

2026年01月06日09:50 来源：小站整理: 参与（0）阅读（176）

摘要：雅思写作大作文驳论范文

题目
Some people believe that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, think that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

范文（Band 8+ 标准）
It is argued by some that expanding sports facilities is the most effective method to enhance public health. While I agree that this measure can play a significant role, I believe it is not a panacea and must be complemented by broader educational and policy initiatives.

On the one hand, proponents of expanding sports infrastructure have valid reasons. Firstly, easy access to facilities such as public gyms, swimming pools, and parks lowers the barrier to physical exercise. For instance, if a running track is built in a residential area, it provides a free and convenient option for residents, thereby encouraging regular activity. Secondly, the visibility of such facilities can foster a community culture that values fitness, making exercise a social norm rather than a chore.

However, this view is limited as it overlooks fundamental obstacles. Merely providing facilities does not guarantee their use. Many people lead sedentary lifestyles not due to a lack of venues, but because of a lack of time, motivation, or health awareness. A busy professional working long hours is unlikely to visit a gym regardless of its proximity. Therefore, the effectiveness of sports facilities is contingent upon individuals' willingness and ability to use them.

Hence, I am convinced that more comprehensive measures are essential to address the root causes of poor health. The most critical step is public health education. Governments and institutions should run campaigns to inform citizens about nutrition, the dangers of processed foods, and the importance of balanced lifestyles. For example, teaching children cooking skills and nutritional knowledge in schools can instill healthy habits for life. Furthermore, stricter regulations are needed. Imposing higher taxes on sugary drinks and junk food, along with clear mandatory labeling, can deter unhealthy consumption more directly than building a sports center. These measures tackle the problem at the source—daily dietary choices.

In conclusion, while increasing sports facilities is a beneficial step that can encourage physical activity for some, it is a partial solution. To substantially improve public health, a synergistic approach that combines accessible infrastructure, widespread health education, and sensible government regulation is far more likely to yield significant and lasting results.

范文深度解析：驳论的精髓
这篇范文清晰地展示了 “讨论双方观点 + 驳斥一方 + 提出己见” 的经典驳论文结构。

1. 结构拆解
引言段：清晰陈述双方立场，并直接亮出自己的核心立场（同意但不够，需要其他措施）。这是高分关键。

主体段1：诚实地阐述对方观点的合理之处（让步）。这里论述了增加体育设施的两个好处，体现了思考的全面性。

主体段2（驳论核心段）：

过渡句：However, this view is limited... 直接指出其局限性。

驳论点1：指出其 “想当然”的逻辑漏洞——有设施不等于会用。这是最有力的驳论方式之一。

驳论点2：提出更深层的、设施无法解决的根本原因（没时间、没动力）。

效果：这段成功地将“增加设施”这一方案降级为“非充分条件”。

主体段3（提出己见）：在驳倒对方方案的“唯一性”后，自然引出自己认为 “更必需、更根本” 的措施（教育和政策），并给出具体例证。

结论段：总结驳论结果，并重申自己的综合方案。

2. 核心驳论技巧
攻击逻辑链：不要攻击观点本身（如“建设施没用”），而是攻击其逻辑链条的薄弱环节。范文攻击的是 “提供X就必然导致Y” 这个逻辑。

提出反证/更深层原因：指出有设施也没人用的现实，并提出设施无法解决的“动机、时间、知识”等更深层问题。