2016年7月9日雅思考试大作文范文一枚
- 2016年07月13日10:29 来源：互联网
- 参与（2） 阅读（6477）
There are many advertisements directed at children, such as snacks, toys and other goods. Parents argue that children are under pressure. Advertisers claim that the advertisements provide useful information. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
在一些国家，广告商增加广告的数量，试图说服孩子们买零食、玩具和其他商品。父母反对给孩子施加这样的压力。但一些广告主声称，这些广告中有有用的信息。讨论两种观点并给出你的意见。
参考范文：
A great deal of advertising is aimed at children, promoting not only toys and sweets but also others products. Although advertisers argue that advertisements may beneficial to the young consumers, many parents, including myself, worry about the negative influence on children.
Firstly, advertising targeting children brings negative consequences. Take the ‘sweetie’ adverts for example, it already draws children in enough as they lick their lips and press their noses against TV screens. They suddenly afterwards, as the hypnotizing commercial fades away they will shout ’Mum, Dad, I need those sweets.’ ’I need them! Everyone has got them!’ In most cases, the parent has to spend money just because it is popular in the child’s world. Now, if children eat a lot sweets, it doesn’t take them very long to be obese. This will make the child’s health run down the chart ever so quickly and can lead to further diseases. Surely, no parents would like this to happen to their child, as the kid will get bullied and embarrassed.
However, advertisers argue that children are also consumers with their own needs and preference. Thus, there are lots of different advertisements to promote different kinds of products. For instance, when it comes to snack ads, children naturally like foods that are rich in fats, proteins and sugar. Because it gives them energy and power to grow.
To conclude, I think that children are too young to be aware of the persuasive intent and should be seen as victims of advertising, not consumers.
(251 words)
本文原载于新浪微博“周华章-Arth雅思写作老师”，如有版权问题，请联系小站管理员修改或删除。
